The next 3 patches do the following:
- first patch adds Richtek Technology Corporation in the vendor-prefixes list
- second patch adds device tree binding example for Richtek RT9455 battery 
charger
- third patch adds the driver for Richtek RT9455 battery charger

The reason why v6 did not contain any modification except for patch splitting, 
is that
I did not scroll down the e-mail and I thought the patch splitting was the only 
modification
I need to do. My bad.

Updates from v6:
- added interrupt-parent and interrupts as required properties in DT file 
rt9455_charger.txt.
- removed interrupt-gpio and reset-gpio from DT file rt9455_charger.txt.
- used IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW (for this charger, it works the same with 
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING and
  with IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, but I prefer IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) in interrupt 
specification, 
  in DT file rt9455_charger.txt.
- removed gpiod_irq and gpio_irq from rt9455_info structure.
- set boost voltage value without previously reading the existing value in the 
register.
- set voreg value without previously reading the existing value in the register.
- removed rt9455_setup_irq function. client->irq is set even without calling 
of_irq_get().
- used devm_power_supply_register() and removed power_supply_unregister() from 
rt9455_remove().

Anda-Maria Nicolae (3):
  of: Add vendor prefix for Richtek Technology Corporation
  Documentation: devicetree: Add Richtek RT9455 bindings
  power_supply: Add support for Richtek RT9455 battery charger

 .../devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt   |   46 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt        |    1 +
 drivers/power/Kconfig                              |    7 +
 drivers/power/Makefile                             |    1 +
 drivers/power/rt9455_charger.c                     | 1751 ++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 1806 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/power/rt9455_charger.c

-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to