2015-05-29 2:37 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Andreas Grünbacher
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2015-05-29 1:11 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>:
>>> How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why does
>>> it deserve to bypass the NFS tree?
>>
>> I've posted this to the linux-nfs mailing list for review among
>> others, how is that
>> bypassing the NFS tree? Would you prefer those things sent to you personally
>> as well?
>
> No. I'm saying that changes that affect the core RPC code should not
> be going through external trees as part of an external feature; they
> should go through the maintainer trees.

I agree, none of that is going to get merged directly.

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to