Hi Jeff-

On May 30, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Split xs_swapper into enable/disable functions and eliminate the
> "enable" flag.
> 
> Currently, it's racy if you have multiple swapon/swapoff operations
> running in parallel over the same xprt. Also fix it so that we only
> set it to a memalloc socket on a 0->1 transition and only clear it
> on a 1->0 transition.
> 
> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h |  5 +++--
> net/sunrpc/clnt.c           |  4 ++--
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> index 8b93ef53df3c..26b1624128ec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt {
>       atomic_t                num_reqs;       /* total slots */
>       unsigned long           state;          /* transport state */
>       unsigned char           resvport   : 1; /* use a reserved port */
> -     unsigned int            swapper;        /* we're swapping over this
> +     atomic_t                swapper;        /* we're swapping over this
>                                                  transport */
>       unsigned int            bind_index;     /* bind function index */
> 
> @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ void                      xprt_release_rqst_cong(struct 
> rpc_task *task);
> void                  xprt_disconnect_done(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> void                  xprt_force_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> void                  xprt_conditional_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, 
> unsigned int cookie);
> -int                  xs_swapper(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, int enable);
> +int                  xs_swapper_enable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> +void                 xs_swapper_disable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> 
> bool                  xprt_lock_connect(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_task *, 
> void *);
> void                  xprt_unlock_connect(struct rpc_xprt *, void *);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index 383cb778179f..804a75e71e84 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -2492,7 +2492,7 @@ retry:
>                       goto retry;
>               }
> 
> -             ret = xs_swapper(xprt, 1);
> +             ret = xs_swapper_enable(xprt);
>               xprt_put(xprt);
>       }
>       return ret;
> @@ -2519,7 +2519,7 @@ retry:
>                       goto retry;
>               }
> 
> -             xs_swapper(xprt, 0);
> +             xs_swapper_disable(xprt);
>               xprt_put(xprt);
>       }
> }

Seems like xs_swapper() is specific to socket-based transports.

There’s no struct sock * to use as an argument with RDMA, so xs_swapper()
would probably dereference garbage if “swapon” was invoked on a
proto=rdma mount point.

Should these new functions be made members of the rpc_xprt_ops? The
RDMA version of the methods can be made no-ops for now.


> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index b29703996028..a2861bbfd319 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -1966,31 +1966,43 @@ static void xs_set_memalloc(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>       struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt,
>                       xprt);
> 
> -     if (xprt->swapper)
> +     if (atomic_read(&xprt->swapper))
>               sk_set_memalloc(transport->inet);
> }
> 
> /**
> - * xs_swapper - Tag this transport as being used for swap.
> + * xs_swapper_enable - Tag this transport as being used for swap.
>  * @xprt: transport to tag
> - * @enable: enable/disable
>  *
> + * Take a reference to this transport on behalf of the rpc_clnt, and
> + * optionally mark it for swapping if it wasn't already.
>  */
> -int xs_swapper(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, int enable)
> +int
> +xs_swapper_enable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> {
>       struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt,
>                       xprt);
> -     int err = 0;
> 
> -     if (enable) {
> -             xprt->swapper++;
> -             xs_set_memalloc(xprt);
> -     } else if (xprt->swapper) {
> -             xprt->swapper--;
> -             sk_clear_memalloc(transport->inet);
> -     }
> +     if (atomic_inc_return(&xprt->swapper) == 1)
> +             sk_set_memalloc(transport->inet);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> 
> -     return err;
> +/**
> + * xs_swapper_disable - Untag this transport as being used for swap.
> + * @xprt: transport to tag
> + *
> + * Drop a "swapper" reference to this xprt on behalf of the rpc_clnt. If the
> + * swapper refcount goes to 0, untag the socket as a memalloc socket.
> + */
> +void
> +xs_swapper_disable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> +{
> +     struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt,
> +                     xprt);
> +
> +     if (atomic_dec_and_test(&xprt->swapper))
> +             sk_clear_memalloc(transport->inet);
> }
> #else
> static void xs_set_memalloc(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> -- 
> 2.4.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to