On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I like the patch set (and you can add my Acked-by:) *except* 7/7, and the >> reason >> for that is that it really isn't entry code, it is user space code. > > Well, I think arch/x86/entry/ should be a broader category for all things > entry > code: and the vsyscall code is closely related to the syscall entry/exit code > so > it's in a better place there than just being in the generic arch/x86/kernel/ > directory. > > I kept it separate in arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/ so it doesn't mix with other > entry > code.
...and my reading comprehension is way off this morning. You already called it arch/x86/entry, so there was no reason for me to suggest that :) Anyway, arch/x86/entry/vdso isn't so bad. It's just a bit odd sounding to me. --Andy > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
