From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>

When unifying the user_dsos and kernel_dsos a bug was introduced by
inverting the check for dso->kernel, fix it.

Fixes: 3d39ac538629 ("perf machine: No need to have two DSOs lists")
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-xnrnq0kams3s2z9ek1wjb...@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 2ed61f59d415..4e29e80932e5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ static int machine__process_kernel_mmap_event(struct 
machine *machine,
                struct dso *dso;
 
                list_for_each_entry(dso, &machine->dsos.head, node) {
-                       if (dso->kernel && is_kernel_module(dso->long_name))
+                       if (!dso->kernel || is_kernel_module(dso->long_name))
                                continue;
 
                        kernel = dso;
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to