On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:37:02PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:

> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm5102.c
> @@ -1875,6 +1875,8 @@ static int wm5102_codec_probe(struct snd_soc_codec 
> *codec)
>       struct wm5102_priv *priv = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
>       int ret;
>  
> +     wm_adsp_init_debugfs(&priv->core.adsp[0], codec);
> +

Why are we adding this init to every individual CODEC rather than doing
it when we initialize the DSP (which there are calls for already)?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +static void wm_adsp_debugfs_save_wmfwname(struct wm_adsp *dsp, const char 
> *s);
> +static void wm_adsp_debugfs_save_binname(struct wm_adsp *dsp, const char *s);
> +static void wm_adsp_debugfs_clear(struct wm_adsp *dsp);
> +#else
> +static inline void wm_adsp_debugfs_save_wmfwname(struct wm_adsp *dsp,
> +                                              const char *s)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void wm_adsp_debugfs_save_binname(struct wm_adsp *dsp,
> +                                             const char *s)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void wm_adsp_debugfs_clear(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +

Why not just put the functions here rather than prototypes?

> +static ssize_t wm_adsp_debugfs_string_read(struct wm_adsp *dsp,
> +                                       char __user *user_buf,
> +                                       size_t count, loff_t *ppos,
> +                                       const char *string)
> +{
> +     char *temp;
> +     int len;
> +     ssize_t ret;
> +
> +     if (!string || !dsp->running)
> +             return 0;

Does debugfs ensure that the right thing happens and this gets treated
as EOF rather than a "zero length read, please retry" (which something
might decide to busy wait trying)?  I'd have expected either an error or
substituting in an empty/informative string here.

> +     temp = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!temp)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     len = snprintf(temp, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", string);

Given that we already have the string I don't understand why we're
allocating the temporary buffer - if it's just the length we're looking
for then strlen() should be enough?

> +} wm_adsp_debugfs_fops[] = {
> +     {
> +             .name = "wmfw_file",

> +             .name = "bin_file",

Bikeshedding but _name not _file perhaps?  It's not going to give you a
copy of the firmware/coefficients.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to