On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:00:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm still not a big fan of the double registration that's being done - > > if nothing else the fact that it's not also factoring out the creation > > of the DSP controls seems wrong. > I don't see the point of trying to fight against the design of ASoC with > the second probe. ASoC gives us what we need at the codec_probe stage > so why try to invent something different? Well, you could've still hung things off the struct device - it's not like the ASoC level device is a requirement here - and like I say the fact that it's not actually factoring out the initialisation that's already happening at the ASoC probe isn't good.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
