* H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:

> %es is used implicitly by string instructions.

Ok, so we are probably better off reloading ES as well early, right
when we return from the firmware, just in case something does
a copy before we hit the ES restore in restore_processor_state(),
which is a generic C function?

Something like the patch below?

I also added FS/GS/SS reloading to make it complete. If this (or a variant 
thereof, it's still totally untested) works then we can remove the segment 
save/restore layer in __save/restore_processor_state().

Thanks,

        Ingo

===========>
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
index 665c6b7d2ea9..1376a7fc21b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
@@ -61,6 +61,19 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_pmode_return)
 
 
 restore_registers:
+       /*
+        * In case the BIOS corrupted our segment descriptors,
+        * reload them to clear out any shadow descriptor
+        * state:
+        */
+       movl    $__USER_DS, %eax
+       movl    %eax, %ds
+       movl    %eax, %es
+       movl    %eax, %fs
+       movl    %eax, %gs
+       movl    $__KERNEL_DS, %eax
+       movl    %eax, %ss
+
        movl    saved_context_ebp, %ebp
        movl    saved_context_ebx, %ebx
        movl    saved_context_esi, %esi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to