On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> @@ -169,29 +169,40 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned 
> long end, int removed)
>
>       for (address = start; address <= end; address += PGDIR_SIZE) {
>               const pgd_t *pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address);
> -             struct page *page;
> +             struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
>               /*
> -              * When it is called after memory hot remove, pgd_none()
> -              * returns true. In this case (removed == 1), we must clear
> -              * the PGD entries in the local PGD level page.
> +              * When this function is called after memory hot remove,
> +              * pgd_none() already returns true, but only the reference
> +              * kernel PGD has been cleared, not the process PGDs.
> +              *
> +              * So clear the affected entries in every process PGD as well:
>                */
>               if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !removed)
>                       continue;
>
> -             spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
> -             list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
> +             spin_lock(&pgd_lock); /* Implies rcu_read_lock() for the task 
> list iteration: */
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmm, but it doesn't if PREEMPT_RCU? No, no, I do not pretend I understand
how it actually works ;) But, say, rcu_check_callbacks() can be called from
irq and since spin_lock() doesn't increment current->rcu_read_lock_nesting
this can lead to rcu_preempt_qs()?

> +             for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> +                     struct mm_struct *mm;
>                       pgd_t *pgd;
>                       spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>
> -                     pgd = (pgd_t *)page_address(page) + pgd_index(address);
> -                     /* the pgt_lock only for Xen */
> -                     pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
> +                     task_lock(p);
> +                     mm = p->mm;
> +                     if (!mm) {
> +                             task_unlock(p);
> +                             continue;
> +                     }

Again, you can simplify this code and avoid for_each_process_thread() if
you use for_each_process() + find_lock_task_mm().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to