* Zachary Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think so too.  I merely moved the code here and didn't notice it in 
> all this excitement.
> 
> 0x00cf9a000xff306600  =>
> 
> Present CPL-0 32-bit code segment, base 0x0000ff30, limit 0xf6601 pages, 
> for which desc_empty(desc) is true.
> 
> Thankfully, this is not used as a security check, but it can falsely 
> overwrite TLS segments with carefully chosen base / limits.  I do not 
> believe this is an issue in practice, but it is a kernel bug.
> 
> Nice catch.  Looks like it affects all 2.6.X kernels.

Thanks, I added this to virt tree, and will push baseline fix up.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to