On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
>>
>> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>>
>>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>>> for the original series posting.]
>
> Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?
I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if
I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection
history, so yes I'll handle it.
Thanks,
Paul.
--
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
