On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Vineet Gupta
<vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 12:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
>> <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
>>> > commit a1c48bb160f8368 "Makefile: Fix unrecognized cross-compiler command
>>> > line
>>> > options" moved ARCH specific cc option handling before common -Os/O2
>>> > setup.
>>> >
>>> > For ARC this had a subtle effect that we can no longer over-ride generic
>>> > -O2 with
>>> > -O3, hence a performance regression observed going from 3.13 to 3.18 (the
>>> > above
>>> > commit went into 3.16)
>>> >
>>> > I want to understand how to properly fix this. Moving the include of arch
>>> > makefile
>>> > will bring back the old issue. I can introduce another option to set
>>> > default optim
>>> > level, but only arc/m32r care about it anyways.
>> Can we include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile twice?
>
> Something like this would be ideal, but does that not bring back your
> warnings ?
I don't think so. The warnings were caused by using the host compiler instead
of the cross compiler while checking for the support of some compiler options.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
