On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? > Can you explain the motivation? > FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still > seems to work on s390 so I dont see any obvious regression. > > Christian
Shorter fragment list often makes processing in the net stack more efficient. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c > > index 928f3f4..80e87e4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c > > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *macvtap_alloc_skb(struct > > sock *sk, size_t prepad, > > linear = len; > > > > skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, prepad + linear, len - linear, noblock, > > - err, 0); > > + err, 1); > > if (!skb) > > return NULL; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c > > index cb376b2d..8f2f1e5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c > > @@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_file > > *tfile, > > linear = len; > > > > skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, prepad + linear, len - linear, noblock, > > - &err, 0); > > + &err, 1); > > if (!skb) > > return ERR_PTR(err); > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
