On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:01:38AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> We can certainly replace the WARN() with pr_warn(), I don't see
> how its confusing though as its a run time real issue. Either
> way whatever you recommend is fine by me.
Yeah, it confused the 0day robot at least. :-)
But maybe because it cannot really read. But I've experienced cases
where people don't read too, see *a* splat and raise the alarm. So yeah,
I think a simple pr_warn would be much better.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
