On Fri 19-06-15 15:32:23, Dave Hansen wrote:
> If I sit in a loop and do write()s to small tmpfs files,
> __sb_end_write() is third-hottest kernel function due to its
> smp_mb().
> 
> The stated purpose for the smp_mb() in __sb_end_write() is to
> ensure "s_writers are updated before we wake up waiters".  We
> only wake up waiters if waitqueue_active(), but we do the
> smp_mb() unconditionally.
> 
> It seems like we should be able to avoid it unless we are
> actually doing the wake_up().
...
> diff -puN fs/super.c~selectively-do-barriers-in-__sb_end_write fs/super.c
> --- a/fs/super.c~selectively-do-barriers-in-__sb_end_write    2015-06-19 
> 15:20:37.953726659 -0700
> +++ b/fs/super.c      2015-06-19 15:20:37.956726794 -0700
> @@ -1147,13 +1147,14 @@ out:
>  void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
>  {
>       percpu_counter_dec(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
> -     /*
> -      * Make sure s_writers are updated before we wake up waiters in
> -      * freeze_super().
> -      */
> -     smp_mb();
> -     if (waitqueue_active(&sb->s_writers.wait))
> +     if (waitqueue_active(&sb->s_writers.wait)) {
> +             /*
> +              * Make sure other CPUs can see our s_writers update
> +              * before we wake up waiters in freeze_super().
> +              */
> +             smp_mb();

I think this is actually wrong. The barrier has to be before the
waitqueue_active() check. Otherwise that read can be reordered before the
percpu counter increment and a race window opens...

But we could make things faster by something like:

__sb_end_write()
        rcu_read_lock();
        percpu_counter_dec(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
        if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level))
                wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait);
        rcu_read_unlock();

So the synchronize_rcu() calls you've added in the first patch will make
sure that all __sb_end_write() calls after we've started the freeze
procedure will end up calling wake_up() and so the process waiting in
sb_wait_write() will be woken as necessary. But please add a detailed
comment about the synchronization because its tricky and uncommon...

                                                                Honza


>               wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait);
> +     }
>       rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _RET_IP_);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write);
> _
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to