On 2015/6/26 16:34, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> On 2015/06/26 10:43, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On 2015/6/26 7:54, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015/06/25 18:44, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>> On 2015/6/10 11:06, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015/06/09 19:04, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015/6/9 15:12, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2015/06/04 22:04, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Add the buddy system interface for address range mirroring feature.
>>>>>>>> Allocate mirrored pages in MIGRATE_MIRROR list. If there is no
>>>>>>>> mirrored pages
>>>>>>>> left, use other types pages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxi...@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>>>>> index d4d2066..0fb55288 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -599,6 +599,26 @@ static inline bool is_mirror_pfn(unsigned long
>>>>>>>> pfn)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> return false;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static inline bool change_to_mirror(gfp_t gfp_flags, int high_zoneidx)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>> + * Do not alloc mirrored memory below 4G, because 0-4G is
>>>>>>>> + * all mirrored by default, and the list is always empty.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> + if (high_zoneidx < ZONE_NORMAL)
>>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + /* Alloc mirrored memory for only kernel */
>>>>>>>> + if (gfp_flags & __GFP_MIRROR)
>>>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GFP_KERNEL itself should imply mirror, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Kame,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about like this: #define GFP_KERNEL (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO |
>>>>>> __GFP_FS | __GFP_MIRROR) ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm.... it cannot cover GFP_ATOMIC at el.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess, mirrored memory should be allocated if !__GFP_HIGHMEM or
>>>>> !__GFP_MOVABLE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kame,
>>>>
>>>> Can we distinguish allocations form user or kernel only by GFP flags?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Allocation from user and file caches are now *always* done with
>>> __GFP_MOVABLE.
>>>
>>> By this, pages will be allocated from MIGRATE_MOVABLE migration type.
>>> MOVABLE migration type means it's can
>>> be the target for page compaction or memory-hot-remove.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Kame
>>>
>>
>> So if we want all kernel memory allocated from mirror, how about change like
>> this?
>> __alloc_pages_nodemask()
>> gfpflags_to_migratetype()
>> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_MOVABLE))
>> return MIGRATE_MIRROR
>
> Maybe used with jump label can reduce performance impact.
Hi Kame,
I am not understand jump label, but I wil try.
> ==
> static inline bool memory_mirror_enabled(void)
> {
> return static_key_false(&memory_mirror_enabled);
> }
>
>
>
> gfpflags_to_migratetype()
> if (memory_mirror_enabled()) { /* We want to mirror all unmovable pages */
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_MOVABLE))
> return MIGRATE_MIRROR
> }
> ==
>
> BTW, I think current memory compaction code scans ranges of MOVABLE migrate
> type.
> So, if you use other migration type than MOVABLE for user pages, you may see
> page fragmentation. If you want to expand this MIRROR to user pages, please
> check
> mm/compaction.c
>
As Tony said "how can we minimize the run-time impact on systems that don't have
any mirrored memory.", I think the idea "kernel only from MIRROR / user only
from
MOVABLE" may be better.
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
