On 06/30/2015 02:23 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> hvc_instantiate() and hvc_alloc() return errors if they fail, so don't
> ignore them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> index 33657dc..f8b8cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_dcc.c
> @@ -225,20 +225,29 @@ static const struct hv_ops hvc_dcc_get_put_ops = {
>  
>  static int __init hvc_dcc_console_init(void)
>  {
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     /* This always runs on boot core */
>       if (!hvc_dcc_check())
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
> -     hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &hvc_dcc_get_put_ops);
> -     return 0;
> +     /* Returns -1 if error */
> +     ret = hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &hvc_dcc_get_put_ops);
> +
> +     return ret < 0 ? -ENODEV : 0;

Why not just return the value that hvc_instantiate returns? And maybe we
should change those -1 in hvc_instantiate into -EPERM?

>  }
>  console_initcall(hvc_dcc_console_init);
>  
>  static int __init hvc_dcc_init(void)
>  {
> +     struct hvc_struct *p;
> +
> +     /* This can run on any core */
>       if (!hvc_dcc_check())
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
> -     hvc_alloc(0, 0, &hvc_dcc_get_put_ops, 128);
> -     return 0;
> +     p = hvc_alloc(0, 0, &hvc_dcc_get_put_ops, 128);
> +
> +     return IS_ERR(p) ? PTR_ERR(p) : 0;

return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO()?

>  }
>  device_initcall(hvc_dcc_init);


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to