Hello, Jason. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:19:32AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > The concept was to move the sysfs files to the natural location on the > core's struct tpm.struct device and leave a symlink behind on the > platform_device for compat.
I see. The only problem I see is that this might get abused. Can you clearly mark the function that it's not intended to be used in anything new, e.g. by renaming it to sth like __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj(). > We could also just move the sysfs file and ignore the compat symlink, > but it is not clear to me if that is an OK UAPI break for sysfs? We shouldn't if it has actual chance of disturbing userland. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
