On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 10:06:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2015 16:17:16 Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > Introduce driver for he Atmel SDMMC available on sama5d2. It is a sdhci
> > compliant controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt | 21 +++
> > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 188
> > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..1b662d7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +* Atmel SDHCI controller
> > +
> > +This file documents the differences between the core properties in
> > +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt and the properties used by
> > the
> > +sdhci-of-at91 driver.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Must be "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci".
> > +- clocks: Phandlers to the clocks.
> > +- clock-names: Must be "hclock", "multclk", "baseclk";
> > +
>
> Are you sure that these are all new clocks that are unrelated to the "core",
> "mmc", and "iface" clocks that are used in other drivers?
>
Maybe hclock could be considered as the core and interface clock. The
mmc clock will be baseclk or multclk. I think other devices manage the
multclk internally. Here we have to provide both clocks. Internally, we
only choose which clock to use and add a divider if necessary.
> > +
> > + priv->mainck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "baseclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->mainck)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get baseclk\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->mainck);
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->hclock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "hclock");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->hclock)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get hclock\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->hclock);
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->gck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "multclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->gck)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get multclk\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->gck);
> > + }
> > +
> > + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, soc_data, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(host))
> > + return PTR_ERR(host);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The mult clock is provided by as a generated clock by the PMC
> > + * controller. In order to set the rate of gck, we have to get the
> > + * base clock rate and the clock mult from capabilities.
> > + */
> > + clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> > + caps0 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
> > + caps1 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1);
> > + clk_base = (caps0 & SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK) >> SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT;
> > + clk_mul = (caps1 & SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK) >> SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_SHIFT;
> > + gck_rate = clk_base * 1000000 * (clk_mul + 1);
> > + ret = clk_set_rate(priv->gck, gck_rate);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to set gck");
> > + goto hclock_disable_unprepare;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Could this be shared with other drivers?
No, it's risk-free to do this.
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
