On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Vince Weaver wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Vince Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm also still getting a lot of > > > perfevents: irq loop stuck! > > > messages, I thought the workaround for that had gone in for 4.2 but I > > > guess not. > > > > Hm, so I was waiting for your feedback regarding the precise period cutoff > > to use, > > and I guess that's where the patch got lost. > > > > Does the value of 2 below work for you? > > I still get the messages when using 2. I'll see if I can narrow down the > cutoff. I know the messages definitely go away when using 128.
>From what I can tell, a value of 2 will still generate "irq loop stuck", but 3 appears to be safe, but I'm still fuzzing to be sure. Previously I ran a kernel with 5 for a while and that also did not generate any messages. Vince -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
