On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:45:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > You just added this function in the previous patch? > > > You're right, it does look a little weird contained in a single > > patch-set. The submission in the previous patch is the tried and > > tested (i.e. in real releases) method written by ST. This patch > > contains a simplification provided by me. IMO it looks and performs > > better, but doesn't have the same time-under-test that the original > > method does. I'm merely ensuring we keep some history in order so > > provide and easy way back i.e. revert. > > > If I have any say at all, I'd really like to keep this piece of > > history. > > OK, that makes sense - can you put the above in the commit message > please?
Sure. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
