3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 2c51a97f76d20ebf1f50fef908b986cb051fdff9 ]

The lockless lookups can return entry that is unlinked.
Sometimes they get reference before last neigh_cleanup_and_release,
sometimes they do not need reference. Later, any
modification attempts may result in the following problems:

1. entry is not destroyed immediately because neigh_update
can start the timer for dead entry, eg. on change to NUD_REACHABLE
state. As result, entry lives for some time but is invisible
and out of control.

2. __neigh_event_send can run in parallel with neigh_destroy
while refcnt=0 but if timer is started and expired refcnt can
reach 0 for second time leading to second neigh_destroy and
possible crash.

Thanks to Eric Dumazet and Ying Xue for their work and analyze
on the __neigh_event_send change.

Fixes: 767e97e1e0db ("neigh: RCU conversion of struct neighbour")
Fixes: a263b3093641 ("ipv4: Make neigh lookups directly in output packet path.")
Fixes: 6fd6ce2056de ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in ip6_finish_output2().")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: Ying Xue <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/core/neighbour.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -976,6 +976,8 @@ int __neigh_event_send(struct neighbour
        rc = 0;
        if (neigh->nud_state & (NUD_CONNECTED | NUD_DELAY | NUD_PROBE))
                goto out_unlock_bh;
+       if (neigh->dead)
+               goto out_dead;
 
        if (!(neigh->nud_state & (NUD_STALE | NUD_INCOMPLETE))) {
                if (NEIGH_VAR(neigh->parms, MCAST_PROBES) +
@@ -1032,6 +1034,13 @@ out_unlock_bh:
                write_unlock(&neigh->lock);
        local_bh_enable();
        return rc;
+
+out_dead:
+       if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_STALE)
+               goto out_unlock_bh;
+       write_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+       kfree_skb(skb);
+       return 1;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__neigh_event_send);
 
@@ -1095,6 +1104,8 @@ int neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh
        if (!(flags & NEIGH_UPDATE_F_ADMIN) &&
            (old & (NUD_NOARP | NUD_PERMANENT)))
                goto out;
+       if (neigh->dead)
+               goto out;
 
        if (!(new & NUD_VALID)) {
                neigh_del_timer(neigh);
@@ -1244,6 +1255,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(neigh_update);
  */
 void __neigh_set_probe_once(struct neighbour *neigh)
 {
+       if (neigh->dead)
+               return;
        neigh->updated = jiffies;
        if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_FAILED))
                return;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to