On 08.07.2015 14:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > A previously defined Device Tree node, can be extended either by defining > a node using the same full path or by creating a label for the node and > referencing to it. > > Using full paths is more error prone since if there was a typo error, a > new node will be created instead of extending the node as it was desired. > This will lead to run-time errors that could be hard to detect. > > A misstyped label on the other hand, will cause a dtc compile error which
s/misstyped/mistyped/ > makes it easier to detect the mistake since happens at build-time instead. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi | 1600 > ++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 799 insertions(+), 801 deletions(-) > I didn't look carefully enough to call it a review (I trust the 'diff' of yours) but it seems fine to me: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
