On 08/07/15 11:28, Robert Richter wrote:
> Marc,
> 
> On 06.07.15 11:43:02, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 30/06/15 15:14, Robert Richter wrote:
>>>  static const struct gic_capabilities gicv3_errata[] = {
>>>     {
>>> +           .desc   = "GIC: Cavium erratum 23154",
>>> +           .id     = 0xa100034c,   /* ThunderX pass 1.x */
>>> +           .mask   = 0xffff0fff,
>>> +           .init   = gicv3_enable_cavium_thunderx,
>>> +   },
>>> +   {
>>>     }
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> How does this work when running a guest? Does the virtualized access
>> suffer from the same erratum? If that's the case, we need a better
>> workaround...
> 
> We need to apply the workaround also for guests. So you are right,
> evaluating GICD_IIDR does not enable the workaround then as the
> register is emulated with ARM as implementer.
> 
> We considering MIDR_EL1 as a version check for this errata now. This
> should be the host's cpuid when running as a guest, right?

Yes, that should work, as we don't repaint MIDR_EL1 *yet*. But it also
means that we're going to have a hard time emulating another CPU (such
as A57) on top of ThunderX. Probably not a big deal at the moment...

        M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to