On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Maninder Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > pdd is already dereferenced before this check. > So it is redundtant to validate pdd here. > > Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > index 8a1f999..4dbc4e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > @@ -431,8 +431,7 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev, > unsigned int pasid) > * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here > * because the IOMMU called us. > */ > - if (pdd) > - pdd->bound = false; > + pdd->bound = false; > > mutex_unlock(&p->mutex); > } > -- > 1.7.9.5 > Hi Maninder,
You are correct pdd was already dereferenced so this check is redundant. However, I think a better patch would be to move the check to where pdd is first acquired (a few lines above it), because I don't see there any check. Could you please do that and resend the patch ? Use latest v4.2-rc1 label from Linus please. Thansk, Oded -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
