On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sorry, the whole behaviour is complety fine. I just don't thing the name > and calling convention of file_to_extint_device is optimal. It should > take an struct inode * and be called just to_extint_device or someting. > The above would become > > struct extint_device *ed = to_extint_device(filp->f_dentry->d_inode);
OK, no problem, since file_to_extint_device() went away anyway. Brent -- Brent Casavant If you had nothing to fear, [EMAIL PROTECTED] how then could you be brave? Silicon Graphics, Inc. -- Queen Dama, Source Wars - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
