On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:02:57PM -0700, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Vladimir Davydov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> > +static struct page *kpageidle_get_page(unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > + struct zone *zone;
> > +
> > + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > + if (!page || PageTail(page) || !PageLRU(page) ||
> > + !get_page_unless_zero(page))
>
> get_page_unless_zero does not succeed for Tail pages.
True. So we don't seem to need the PageTail checks here at all, because
if kpageidle_get_page succeeds, the page must be a head, so that we
won't dive into expensive rmap_walk for tail pages. Will remove it then.
>
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(PageTail(page))) {
> > + put_page(page);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + zone = page_zone(page);
> > + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> > + if (unlikely(!PageLRU(page))) {
> > + put_page(page);
> > + page = NULL;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> > + return page;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int kpageidle_clear_pte_refs_one(struct page *page,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > + spinlock_t *ptl;
> > + pmd_t *pmd;
> > + pte_t *pte;
> > + bool referenced = false;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) {
>
> VM_BUG_ON(!PageHead)?
Don't think it's necessary, because PageTransHuge already does this sort
of check:
: static inline int PageTransHuge(struct page *page)
: {
: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail(page), page);
: return PageHead(page);
: }
>
> > + pmd = page_check_address_pmd(page, mm, addr,
> > + PAGE_CHECK_ADDRESS_PMD_FLAG,
> > &ptl);
> > + if (pmd) {
> > + referenced = pmdp_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr,
> > pmd);
>
> For any workload using MMU notifiers, this will lose significant
> information by not querying the secondary PTE. The most
> straightforward case is KVM. Once mappings are setup, all access
> activity is recorded through shadow PTEs. This interface will say
> "idle" even though the VM is blasting memory.
Hmm, interesting. It seems we have to introduce
mmu_notifier_ops.clear_young then, which, in contrast to
clear_flush_young, won't flush TLB. Looking back at your comment to v6,
now I see that you already mentioned it, but I missed your point :-(
OK, will do it in the next iteration.
Thanks a lot for the review!
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
