On Thursday 25 August 2005 19:12, Zachary Amsden wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >On Sunday 07 August 2005 14:16, Zachary Amsden wrote: > > > > > >FYI I have queued it, but cannot apply it because the necessary generic > >code support is still not in mainline. > > Here's the patch for generic / i386 support; it's already in the -mm tree.
I'll probably not put that into my tree because I try to avoid generic patches of other people - i assume it's queued for mainline. If you want you can include the x86-64 patch with that submission too (it's fine for me), alternatively I'll submit it later when I do the next merge from i386 (that might take some time though) or remember about it for some other reason. > > >Do you have any other optimizations pending for x86-64? > > > >There is still the iopl optimization that you did that is on my TODO list > > to add. Anything else. > > I started porting the IOPL work, but got confused in my tree and end up > patching asm-i386 with x86-64 code. The joy of unenforced source control! Ok. When you don't get around to it I'll eventually. > > I have some other MMU optimizations pending that will hopefully be a win > for all architectures; still measuring which alternative is best there. Ok. Thanks. Please keep me updated on that. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
