On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 11:54 -0700, George Anzinger wrote: > > > I think the best thing is to take idr into user space and emulate the > > problem usage. > > Good plan, I guess. Do you think that's easy? > > > To this end, from the log it appears that you _might_ be > > moving between 0, 1 and 2 entries increasing the number each time. It > > also appears that the failure happens here: > > add 1023 > > add 1024 > > find 1024 or is it the remove that fails? It also looks like 1024 got > > allocated twice. Am I reading the log correctly? > > Remove 1024 fails, but add(please make it >1024) seems to return 1024, > and find(1024) also seems to fail. Well, remove() probably has to > find(), but I'm not really sure what inotify does (maybe find first, to > see if it's valid).
Just to clarify, the remove() he is talking about isn't idr_remove, it is inotify's remove. idr_find() is failing at 1024 which causes inotify's remove to fail. -- John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/