On 07/21/2015 01:41 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
In the TRM we see that BWADJ is "a 12-bit bus that selects the values 1-4096 for the bandwidth divider (NB)": NB = BWADJ[11:0] + 1 The recommended setting of NB: NB = NF / 2.So: NB = NF / 2 BWADJ[11:0] + 1 = NF / 2 BWADJ[11:0] = NF / 2 - 1 Right now, we have: { \ .rate = _rate##U, \ .nr = _nr, \ .nf = _nf, \ .no = _no, \ .bwadj = (_nf >> 1), \ } That means we set bwadj to NF / 2, not NF / 2 - 1 All of this is a bit confusing because we specify "NR" (the 1-based value), "NF" (the 1-based value), "NO" (the 1-based value), but "BWADJ" (the 0-based value) instead of "NB" (the 1-based value). Let's change to working with "NB" and fix the off by one error. This may affect PLL jitter in a small way (hopefully for the better). Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
There's no Fixes tag or stable Cc so I take it this isn't fixing any manifesting regression, more of a visual inspection bug find?
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
