On 7/22/15 1:09 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
According to the perf_event_map_fd and key, the function
bpf_perf_event_read() can convert the corresponding map
value to the pointer to struct perf_event and return the
Hardware PMU counter value.

The key can't be passed to bpf_perf_event_read() directly
because the function argument constraint is lacked.

I don't understand above sentence.

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 69a1f6b..e3bb181 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
         * Return: 0 on success
         */
        BPF_FUNC_get_current_comm,
+
+       BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read,       /* u64 bpf_perf_event_read(&map, &key) 
*/

no need for extra empty line.

+
+static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+       struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
+       void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
+       struct perf_event *event;
+       void *ptr;
+
+       if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY)
+               return -EINVAL;

please check this statically in verifier instead of in run-time.

+
+       rcu_read_lock();

unnecessary.

+       ptr = map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       if (!ptr || !(*(unsigned long *)ptr))
+               return -EBADF;

all these casts can be removed. First cast of 'r1' into
perf_event_array will be enough.

+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
+       .func           = bpf_perf_event_read,
+       .gpl_only       = false,
+       .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
+       .arg1_type      = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
+       .arg2_type      = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,

make it arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING then you'll just index
into array the way prog_array does and similar to bpf_tail_call.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to