On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:33:51 +0200
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jon, would you mind if I take this patch and let it go through the media
> tree? I'd like to apply a patch on top of this one that removes the mention of
> devfs.

Fine, I'll drop it.

> It makes more sense in general to take patches to Documentation/DocBook/media
> via the media route.

OK.  I'll stick the following into MAINTAINERS so I'm not tempted to grab
them from you :)

jon

MAINTAINERS: Direct Documentation/DocBook/media properly

The media maintainers want DocBook changes to go through their tree;
document that wish accordingly.
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b9b91566380e..11e2516c2712 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3440,6 +3440,7 @@ X:        Documentation/devicetree/
 X:     Documentation/acpi
 X:     Documentation/power
 X:     Documentation/spi
+X:     Documentation/DocBook/media
 T:     git git://git.lwn.net/linux-2.6.git docs-next
 
 DOUBLETALK DRIVER
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to