On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:32:57AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:21:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:24:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c > > > > > + update_stats(&runtime_cycles_in_tx_stats[ctx][cpu], > > > > > count[0]); > > > > > oops, looks like copy&paste issue.. thanks > > > > > we now print comment line if the avg is 0, but I think it's ok > > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > > > This affects just perf/core, right? > > > I guess, dont think it's an urgent one.. Andi, please speak up ;-) > > I'm not talking about it being urgent or not, I'm talking about it being > a bug present only in perf/core or if this is something that is in > perf/urgent, i.e. affects what is in Linus's upstream tree, etc.
ah ok, it affects perf/urgent as well jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
