We just need to take care of single event here and there is no need to increase indentation level of most of the code (which causes lines longer that 80 columns to break).
Kill the switch block. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 276cec5a1fb7..bf2673bb3cf5 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -218,27 +218,21 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long max_freq; struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev; - switch (event) { + if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) + return NOTIFY_DONE; - case CPUFREQ_ADJUST: - mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); - list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_dev, &cpufreq_dev_list, node) { - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, - &cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus)) - continue; + mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); + list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_dev, &cpufreq_dev_list, node) { + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, &cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus)) + continue; - max_freq = cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val; + max_freq = cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val; - if (policy->max != max_freq) - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, - max_freq); - break; - } - mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); + if (policy->max != max_freq) + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); break; - default: - return NOTIFY_DONE; } + mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); return NOTIFY_OK; } -- 2.4.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
