Hi Heiko, On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Also we can try to see if critical clocks aren't being forced on by > > > applying this patch and looking for clk_get() failures > > > > And that shows that the CPU and DDR clocks are not protected, which > > obviously is pretty mad. > > > > I've mass converted all our probing code to use OF_CLK_DECLARE, and > > make things work again. > > > > http://code.bulix.org/5goa5j-88345?raw > > > > Is this an acceptable solution? > > > > We were already moving to this, I'm not really fond of doing this like > > that, but I guess this whole debacle makes it necessary. > > > did this lead anywhere meanwhile. > > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get any news since that mail. I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the situation worse for the time being). Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
