3.2.70-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabi...@samsung.com>

commit 8defb3367fcd19d1af64c07792aade0747b54e0f upstream.

Usually ELF_ET_DYN_BASE is 2/3 of TASK_SIZE. With 3G/1G user/kernel
split this is not so, because 2*TASK_SIZE overflows 32 bits,
so the actual value of ELF_ET_DYN_BASE is:
        (2 * TASK_SIZE / 3) = 0x2a000000

When ASLR is disabled PIE binaries will load at ELF_ET_DYN_BASE address.
On 32bit platforms AddressSanitzer uses addresses [0x20000000 - 0x40000000]
for shadow memory [1]. So ASan doesn't work for PIE binaries when ASLR disabled
as it fails to map shadow memory.
Also after Kees's 'split ET_DYN ASLR from mmap ASLR' patchset PIE binaries
has a high chance of loading somewhere in between [0x2a000000 - 0x40000000]
even if ASLR enabled. This makes ASan with PIE absolutely incompatible.

Fix overflow by dividing TASK_SIZE prior to multiplying.
After this patch ELF_ET_DYN_BASE equals to (for CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y):
        (TASK_SIZE / 3 * 2) = 0x7f555554

[1] 
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizerAlgorithm#Mapping

Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabi...@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Maria Guseva <m.gus...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/elf.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int dump_task_regs(struct task_struct *t
    the loader.  We need to make sure that it is out of the way of the program
    that it will "exec", and that there is sufficient room for the brk.  */
 
-#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE        (2 * TASK_SIZE / 3)
+#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE        (TASK_SIZE / 3 * 2)
 
 /* When the program starts, a1 contains a pointer to a function to be 
    registered with atexit, as per the SVR4 ABI.  A value of 0 means we 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to