From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 7444a072c387a93ebee7066e8aee776954ab0e41 upstream.

ext4_free_blocks is looping around the allocation request and mimics
__GFP_NOFAIL behavior without any allocation fallback strategy. Let's
remove the open coded loop and replace it with __GFP_NOFAIL. Without the
flag the allocator has no way to find out never-fail requirement and
cannot help in any way.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 16 +++++-----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 7620133f78bf..c4a5e4df8ca3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4793,18 +4793,12 @@ do_more:
                /*
                 * blocks being freed are metadata. these blocks shouldn't
                 * be used until this transaction is committed
+                *
+                * We use __GFP_NOFAIL because ext4_free_blocks() is not allowed
+                * to fail.
                 */
-       retry:
-               new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_free_data_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
-               if (!new_entry) {
-                       /*
-                        * We use a retry loop because
-                        * ext4_free_blocks() is not allowed to fail.
-                        */
-                       cond_resched();
-                       congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
-                       goto retry;
-               }
+               new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_free_data_cachep,
+                               GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
                new_entry->efd_start_cluster = bit;
                new_entry->efd_group = block_group;
                new_entry->efd_count = count_clusters;
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to