On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The broken extern inline usage resulted in gcc5 duplicating the
> functions causing link errors due to duplicate symbols.

Why isn't gcc fixed instead? The whole "extern inline" thing was
documented to work the way it did, this gcc breakage is annoying, and
I refuse tp apply patches that imply that it is a bug in the kernel
when it's the compiler that messes up.

So it's not "broken extern inline usage". It's a broken compiler
changing things. Again.

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to