On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 07:10:57PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 07/27, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > Hence those two debatable changes: > > > > _ We would like to use generic workqueues. System unbound workqueues are > > a very good candidate but they are not wide affine, only node affine. > > Now probably a node is enough to perform many parallel kmod jobs. > > > > _ We would like to remove the wait_for_helper kernel thread (UMH_WAIT_PROC > > handler) to use the workqueue. It means that if the workqueue blocks, > > and no other worker can take pending kmod request, we can be screwed. > > Now if we have 512 threads, this should be enough. > > I think this series is fine. Feel free to add my reviewed-by.
Great! Andrew, if you're ok with it, can you please apply this set? Thanks a lot! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
