Hi Richard, On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:21:27 +0200 Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote:
> Andrea, > > Am 04.08.2015 um 09:02 schrieb Andrea Scian: > >> I'm not sure whether introducing a read-before-write check is the best > >> solution. > >> At least we need hard numbers for slow/old SLC NANDs too. > > > > We can enable the feature only for MLC, AFAIK it has not been required for > > old SLC ;-) > > I think this needs more discussion. > > Boris, Brian, will you be at Embedded Linux Conference Europe in Dublin? > Maybe we can discuss these issues (data retention, ff-checks, etc...) in > person and figure out where to address them. > I really want to avoid ad-hoc solutions. :) I'll be at ELCE and I'd be happy to discuss all these NAND/MTD/UBI related issues with you, though I think we should keep discussing those problems on the ML too. Best Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/