On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:02:08PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call regulator_set_voltage() > on a load switches that are modelled as regulators with a parent supply as > there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. > To avoid this warning, use the unlocked version of the get_voltage().
No, just completely removing the locking is broken - the locking is there for a reason! This needs some lockdep dance, either something like what we have for regmaps with a class per regulator or something more fancy but whatever's going on just hacking out locking to shut up warnings from lockdep is clearly not a good idea.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature