On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:40:34 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/05, Paul Moore wrote: > > I suspect it was lost in the noise when I mentioned it on v4, but how > > about changing AUDIT_DEV_UNSET to "(dev_t)-1"? > > I saw your comment only after resubmitting. I'm fine either way. If it > is needed for uapi later it can be changed then. Is it easy to change > in your workflow, or should I resubmit? I know you routinely change the > patch description, but could not remember if you have actually changed > the patch itself...
With the exception of trivial merge conflicts, in general I like to avoid changing the body of the patches when I apply them; there are always going to be exceptions, but when possible I try to avoid it. I consider tweaking the patch subject lines pretty trivial, especially in the last case where the subject line had become wrong/invalid due to changes in the patch itself. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
