On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:07:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-08-15, 13:12, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >From 993ebb6fc632ec7b61654c9610c90ff4dca4be34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]> > > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:07:51 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq-dt: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available > > when boost is enabled > > > > Make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attribute is available when > > cpufreq-dt driver is used and boost support is enabled. > > > > Cc: Thomas Abraham <[email protected]> > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > > index b9259ab..c6a3b98 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c > > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ struct private_data { > > unsigned int voltage_tolerance; /* in percentage */ > > }; > > > > +static struct freq_attr *cpufreq_dt_attr[] = { > > + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs, > > + NULL, /* Extra space for boost-attr if required */ > > + NULL, > > +}; > > + > > static int set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) > > { > > struct dev_pm_opp *opp; > > @@ -182,6 +188,8 @@ try_again: > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver; > > + > > static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > { > > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; > > @@ -336,6 +344,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > ret = cpufreq_enable_boost_support(); > > if (ret) > > goto out_free_cpufreq_table; > > + cpufreq_dt_attr[1] = &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs; > > } > > > > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency; > > @@ -411,7 +420,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver = { > > .exit = cpufreq_exit, > > .ready = cpufreq_ready, > > .name = "cpufreq-dt", > > - .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr, > > + .attr = cpufreq_dt_attr, > > }; > > > > static int dt_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > index 95f0186..657542d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > @@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ struct cpufreq_frequency_table > > *cpufreq_frequency_get_table(unsigned int cpu); > > > > /* the following are really really optional */ > > extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs; > > +extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs; > > extern struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[]; > > int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table); > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
And what exactly am I supposed to do with this? Have a robot that will pick up all patches ACKed by you magically or what? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
