Since 906c55579a63 ("timekeeping: Copy the shadow-timekeeper over the
real timekeeper last") it has become possible on ARM to:

- Obtain a CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE or CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE timestamp
  via syscall.
- Subsequently obtain a timestamp for the same clock ID via VDSO which
  predates the first timestamp (by one jiffy).

This is because ARM's update_vsyscall is deriving the coarse time
using the __current_kernel_time interface, when it should really be
using the timekeeper object provided to it by the timekeeping core.
It happened to work before only because __current_kernel_time would
access the same timekeeper object which had been passed to
update_vsyscall.  This is no longer the case.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan_ly...@mentor.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
index efe17dd9b921..c8b243c1aef8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ static bool tk_is_cntvct(const struct timekeeper *tk)
  */
 void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
 {
-       struct timespec xtime_coarse;
        struct timespec64 *wtm = &tk->wall_to_monotonic;
 
        if (!cntvct_ok) {
@@ -308,10 +307,10 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *tk)
 
        vdso_write_begin(vdso_data);
 
-       xtime_coarse = __current_kernel_time();
        vdso_data->tk_is_cntvct                 = tk_is_cntvct(tk);
-       vdso_data->xtime_coarse_sec             = xtime_coarse.tv_sec;
-       vdso_data->xtime_coarse_nsec            = xtime_coarse.tv_nsec;
+       vdso_data->xtime_coarse_sec             = tk->xtime_sec;
+       vdso_data->xtime_coarse_nsec            = tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec >>
+                                                       tk->tkr_mono.shift;
        vdso_data->wtm_clock_sec                = wtm->tv_sec;
        vdso_data->wtm_clock_nsec               = wtm->tv_nsec;
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to