[PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

[Mel Gorman]

There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures
when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need
to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
---
 include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 1b357997cac5..6eb27cb480b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ extern void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct 
task_struct *p);
  */
 static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
 {
+       if (!cpusets_enabled())
+               return 0;
+
        return read_seqcount_begin(&current->mems_allowed_seq);
 }
 
@@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
  */
 static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
 {
+       if (!cpusets_enabled())
+               return false;
+
        return read_seqcount_retry(&current->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
 }
 
-- 
2.4.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/