Task load or utilization is not currently considered in select_task_rq_fair(), but if we want that in the future we should make sure it is not zero for new tasks.
cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <[email protected]> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index b11f624..ae9fca32 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) struct rq *rq; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); + /* Initialize new task's runnable average */ + init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* * Fork balancing, do it here and not earlier because: @@ -2303,8 +2305,6 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) set_task_cpu(p, select_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p), SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0)); #endif - /* Initialize new task's runnable average */ - init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se); rq = __task_rq_lock(p); activate_task(rq, p, 0); p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
