On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:17:29 +0800 Sean Fu <fxinr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:48:01 +0800 > > Sean Fu <fxinr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > Defending the patch, I can't imagine any user space code expecting the > >> > current behavior. The current behavior is that if you write "1\0" it > >> > will error out instead of accepting the "1". I can't come up with a > >> > scenario that would require userspace to expect "1\0" to fail. Can you? > >> Thanks > > > > Although, with the current patch, would "1\02" fail? It should. > Yes, "1\02" is equal to "1\2"(count=2) or "1\2\0"(count=3), So it should fail. Sorry, I meant "1\0 2" -- Steve > > code > len = write(fd, "1\0\2", 3); > > strace execute result: > write(3, "1\2\0", 3) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) > > > > > -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
