Caesar Wang <w...@rock-chips.com> writes:
> This driver is found on RK3288 SoCs.
>
> In order to meet high performance and low power requirements, a power
> management unit is designed or saving power when RK3288 in low power
> mode.
> The RK3288 PMU is dedicated for managing the power of the whole chip.
>
> PMU can work in the Low Power Mode by setting bit[0] of PMU_PWRMODE_CON
> register. After setting the register, PMU would enter the Low Power mode.
> In the low power mode, pmu will auto power on/off the specified power
> domain, send idle req to specified power domain, shut down/up pll and
> so on. All of above are configurable by setting corresponding registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.h...@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <w...@rock-chips.com>
[...]
> +static void rockchip_pm_remove_one_domain(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pd->num_clks; i++) {
> + clk_unprepare(pd->clks[i]);
> + clk_put(pd->clks[i]);
> + }
You don't set pd->num_clks = 0 here, which means other places that
iterate over the clocks might race with this and try to use clocks that
have been unprepared/put.
This might be over-paranoid, but in particular, this could race with
rockchip_pd_power().
Also not setting the pd->num_clks to zero would be a problem for a
power-controller that is configured as a module which could be unloaded
and reloaded (I know that doesn't really work now, but it will
eventually, I hope.)
Maybe use the mutex here? It should at least protect the zeroing of
pm->num_clks.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
