On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Sean O. Stalley <sean.stal...@intel.com> wrote:
> Would it be better to modify pci_claim_resource() to support EA instead of > adding pci_ea_claim_resource()? > That way, EA entries would be claimed at the same time as traditional BARs. Yes, I think so. Why wouldn't pci_claim_resource() work as-is for EA? I see that pci_ea_get_parent_resource() defaults to iomem_resource or ioport_resource if we don't find a parent, but I don't understand why that's necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
