Em Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:19:04PM +0200, Jan Stancek escreveu: > On 09/03/2015 05:14 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:35:55PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > >> On 03/09/15 14:23, Jan Stancek wrote: > >>> Add -z parameter to avoid skipping zero blocks: > >>> > >>> ffffffff816704fe <sysret_check+0x4b>: > >>> ffffffff816704fe: 7b 34 jnp ffffffff81670534 > >>> <sysret_signal+0x1c> > >>> ... > >>> ffffffff81670501 <sysret_careful>: > >>> ffffffff81670501: 0f ba e2 03 bt $0x3,%edx > >>> ffffffff81670505: 73 11 jae ffffffff81670518 <sysret_signal> > >> > >> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com> > > > > Ok, I am applying this, but it would be nice to know in which systems, > > with which objdump/binutils versions which 'perf test' entry fails, with > > the output of such failure. > > > > Jan, can you please provide this info? > > Since my original report last year [1], I've seen it fail many times on
Ok, so it is a longstanding bug and now I have some tool output where it fails to complement what was in these two patches, thanks, I'll update it and put it on my next perf/urgent pull request to upstream. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
